skip to content
 

Bibliography: Which Development? For Whom?

  • Altmann, P. 2017. Sumak Kawsay as an Element of Local Decolonization in Ecuador. Latin American Research Review, 52(5).
  • Bebbington, T. 2018. Commentary I: Difference and transformation: Dilemmas in interpreting development in Ecuador. Progress in Human Geography, 42(4), 631-633.
  • Cabalé Miranda, E. and Rodríguez Pérez de Agreda, G. M. 2018. Progress and Development: One and the Same in Latin America? Latin American Perspectives, 45(2), 62-73.
  • Caria, S. and Domínguez, R. 2016. Ecuador’s Buen vivir: A New Ideology for Development. Latin American Perspectives, 43(1), 18-33.
  • Chartock, S. 2013. “Corporatism With Adjectives”? Conceptualizing Civil Society Incorporation and Indigenous Participation in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society, 55(2), 52-76.
  • Escobar, A. 2010. Latin America at a Crossroads. Cultural Studies, 24(1), 1-65.
  • Grugel, J. and Riggirozzi, P. 2012. Post-neoliberalism in Latin America: Rebuilding and Reclaiming the State after Crisis. Development and Change, 43(1), 1-21.
  • Gudynas, E., 2009. Diez Tesis Urgentes sobre el Nuevo Extractivismo: Contextos y Demandas Bajo el Progresismo Sudamericano Actual. In: Schuldt, J., et al. eds. Extractivismo, Política y Sociedad. Quito: CAAP & CLAES, 187-225.
  • Gudynas, E., 2016. Natural Resource Nationalisms and the Compensatory State in Progressive South America. In: Haslam, P. A. and Heidrich, P. eds. The Political Economy of Resources and Development: From Neoliberalism to Resource Nationalism London: Routledge, 103-117.
  • Jackson, M. 2018. Commentary III: Decolonizing critique? Progress in Human Geography, 42(4), 635-637.
  • Marston, A. and Kennemore, A. 2018. Extraction, Revolution, Plurinationalism: Rethinking Extractivism from Bolivia. Latin American Perspectives, online first, 1-20.
  • Mignolo, W. D. 2007. DELINKING. Cultural Studies, 21(2-3), 449-514.
  • Mignolo, W. D. 2011. Geopolitics of sensing and knowing: on (de)coloniality, border thinking and epistemic disobedience. Postcolonial Studies, 14(3), 273-283.
  • Munck, R. 2015. Rethinking Latin America: Back to the Future? Latin American Perspectives, 42(4), 73-91.
  • Radcliffe, S. A. 2012. Development for a postneoliberal era? Sumak kawsay, living well and the limits to decolonisation in Ecuador. Geoforum, 43(2), 240-249.
  • Radcliffe, S. A. 2015a. Development Alternatives. Development and Change, 46(4), 855-874.
  • Radcliffe, S. A., 2015b. Dilemmas of Difference: Indigenous Women and the Limits of Postcolonial Development Policy. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Radcliffe, S. A. 2018. Author’s response: Situating difference, boundary work and de-colonial perspectives. Progress in Human Geography, 42(4), 638-640.
  • Svampa, M. 2013. Consenso de "Commodities" y Lenguajes de Valoración en América Latina. Nueva Sociedad, (244), 30-46.
  • Webber, J. R. 2017. Contemporary Latin American Inequality: Class Struggle, Decolonization, and the Limits of Liberal Citizenship. Latin American Research Review, 52(2), 281-299.
  • Wolff, J. 2013. Towards Post-Liberal Democracy in Latin America? A Conceptual Framework Applied to Bolivia. Journal of Latin American Studies, 45, 31-59.
  • Yates, J. S. and Bakker, K. 2014. Debating the ‘Post-Neoliberal turn’ in Latin America. Progress in Human Geography, 38(1), 62-90.
  • Zimmerer, K. S. 2018. Commentary II: New postcolonial insights on gender, indigeneity, and development, and refractions to environment and health issues. Progress in Human Geography, 42(4), 633-635.